The Physician Assisted Suicide Should Be A Fundamental Right Essay

1485 Words Nov 24th, 2014 6 Pages
The discussion whether the physician assisted suicide should be a fundamental right has been a topic for discussion and was raised periodically. Fundamental right are usually rights that are deeply rooted social and moral norms that exists in society. In our nation suicide and murder had been crime from colonial time as well as our judicial system never supported suicide or killing someone. The idea behind physician assisted suicide is to end someone life with his/her consent. The consent does not make it less of a crime and therefore the government said that it is not a fundamental right. Additionally, if we look at our stare decides the Supreme Court has provided constitutional protection the practices that are 'deeply rooted in this Nation 's history and tradition. ' While this constitutional principle is subject to debate, its effect is clear on the distinction between the refusal of treatment and suicide. In our nation’s history individuals have never been granted a right to control the timing and manner of their death. This asserted right has no place in our nation 's traditions, known that the country has consistently and continuously rejected the right, even for terminally ill, mentally competent adults. The court has said that it is not mentioned in our constitution that to assist someone to end their life is a fundamental right. As well as Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill the court clearly stated that the right at issue is not a fundamental right and…

Related Documents