Minimum Legal Drinking Age Should Be Lowered Essay
There are many arguments on whether the minimum legal drinking age should be lowered from twenty-one to a younger age such as eighteen. According to “Minimum Legal Drinking Age Pros and Cons” (2014), “all 50 US states have set their minimum drinking age to 21 although exceptions do exist on a state-by-state basis for consumption at home, under adult supervision, for medical necessity, and other reasons” (p.1). If the minimum legal drinking age is lowered to a younger age, it could harm a young person’s body and brain. There will always be debatable arguments on keeping the minimum legal drinking age at twenty-one or lowering it.
Having the minimum legal drinking age being twenty-one has many pros that go along with it. Some arguments for the minimum legal drinking age are, reducing alcohol related traffic fatalities. According to “MADD, Mothers Against Drunk Driving” (2014), “this law continues to prevent tragedies—decreasing crashes by an estimated 16 percent and keeping young people safer from many risks” (p.1). Other arguments for the MLDA (minimum legal drinking age) are it prevents alcohol dependence when people wait until they are older to begin drinking and also states that the younger the person is, they haven’t reached the age where they can drink responsibly. Figure 1: Source: "Most Americans Oppose Lowering Legal Drinking Age to 18 Nationwide," www.gallup.com, July 27, 2007
In the chart above you can clearly see that 77% of people…